<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Without Pictures – Breaking The Rules?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinkoss.com/blogging/blogging-without-pictures-breaking-the-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinkoss.com/blogging/blogging-without-pictures-breaking-the-rules/</link>
	<description>I don&#039;t mean to be so opinionated and argumentative, it&#039;s just me...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Koss</title>
		<link>http://www.martinkoss.com/blogging/blogging-without-pictures-breaking-the-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Koss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinkoss.com/?p=1357#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Hi Vicki. Thank you for adding your thoughts to the &#039;conversation&#039; about &#039;Blooging With  (or without) Pictures&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you that some blogs are not very well written and I think many add pictures just to fill the space more than the very short and sweet post takes up - but I also think that sometimes a very short and to the point post sits fine by itself, picture or no picture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re most welcome for the link. I thoroughly enjoy your writing - you have a great creative way of merging a bit of humour with a serious point - and many of your pictures work too - they subtly enhance the post rather than distract from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vicki. Thank you for adding your thoughts to the &#39;conversation&#39; about &#39;Blooging With  (or without) Pictures&#39;.</p>
<p>I agree with you that some blogs are not very well written and I think many add pictures just to fill the space more than the very short and sweet post takes up &#8211; but I also think that sometimes a very short and to the point post sits fine by itself, picture or no picture.</p>
<p>You&#39;re most welcome for the link. I thoroughly enjoy your writing &#8211; you have a great creative way of merging a bit of humour with a serious point &#8211; and many of your pictures work too &#8211; they subtly enhance the post rather than distract from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vegemitevix</title>
		<link>http://www.martinkoss.com/blogging/blogging-without-pictures-breaking-the-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>vegemitevix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinkoss.com/?p=1357#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Good point Martin. I&#039;ve been thinking a little about pictures too recently, and have come to the conclusion that they really need to be about the post, and if you can&#039;t find the perfect picture that illustrates how to &#039;self-love&#039; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vegemitevix.com/2010/04/how-to-self-love/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vegemitevix.com/2010/04/how-to-self-...&lt;/a&gt; for example hee hee) then you&#039;re better off leaving it out! I think pictures can be a huge distraction if they don&#039;t fit the context of the post, but then as you know I&#039;m more of a writer than a photographer so I would say that wouldn&#039;t I! Mind you, sometimes I wonder whether the writing is enough in itself also.  Many of the very large blogs are not neccessarily well written. What makes them popular? Is it the pictures? :-) (thanks for the link btw I really appreciate it!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Martin. I&#39;ve been thinking a little about pictures too recently, and have come to the conclusion that they really need to be about the post, and if you can&#39;t find the perfect picture that illustrates how to &#39;self-love&#39; (<a href="http://www.vegemitevix.com/2010/04/how-to-self-love/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vegemitevix.com/2010/04/how-to-self-&#8230;</a> for example hee hee) then you&#39;re better off leaving it out! I think pictures can be a huge distraction if they don&#39;t fit the context of the post, but then as you know I&#39;m more of a writer than a photographer so I would say that wouldn&#39;t I! Mind you, sometimes I wonder whether the writing is enough in itself also.  Many of the very large blogs are not neccessarily well written. What makes them popular? Is it the pictures? <img src='http://www.martinkoss.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  (thanks for the link btw I really appreciate it!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

